Donate | Learn | Listen | Videos

How To Make THERMITE
* FREE HOT MYSPACE LAYOUTS *
Black bloc

>>> Just say 'no' to police searches <<<

Archive for the 'Utah Police' Category

Police Chief Shoots Self at Gun Training Session

Posted in Police Stupidity, Utah Police on May 5th, 2008

RIVERDALE, Utah
The police chief in Riverdale accidentally shot himself in an ankle while demonstrating how to dislodge a jammed handgun.

Chief Dave Hansen was taken to McKay-Dee Hospital in Ogden for surgery.

The 54-year-old chief accidentally fired a gun during a training exercise inside a conference room at Riverdale police headquarters.

A fire captain and Riverdale Mayor Bruce Burrows confirmed the chief shot himself Saturday in an ankle bone. They said he was trying to fix a gun with a jammed round when the bullet fired.

Riverdale police officers carry .40-caliber pistols.

Hospital supervisor Rohn Larsen said Hansen was in stable condition Sunday. Larsen said he couldn’t reveal which ankle — left or right — the chief shot.

A Weber County dispatcher said nobody from the Riverdale police department was available Sunday to release any information on the accident. A patrol officer on duty Sunday said he didn’t know anything about it.

The chief’s brother, a state lawmaker, said Hansen is a 23-year veteran and chief of the Riverdale police force since 2006.

Rep. Neil Hansen, D-Ogden, said he regularly goes target practicing with his brother and described him as safety-conscious.

“I’ve never seen him do anything reckless,” Neil Hansen told the Standard-Examiner of Ogden.

source

Police Chief Shoots Self at Gun Training Session

Posted in Police Stupidity, Utah Police on May 5th, 2008

RIVERDALE, Utah
The police chief in Riverdale accidentally shot himself in an ankle while demonstrating how to dislodge a jammed handgun.

Chief Dave Hansen was taken to McKay-Dee Hospital in Ogden for surgery.

The 54-year-old chief accidentally fired a gun during a training exercise inside a conference room at Riverdale police headquarters.

A fire captain and Riverdale Mayor Bruce Burrows confirmed the chief shot himself Saturday in an ankle bone. They said he was trying to fix a gun with a jammed round when the bullet fired.

Riverdale police officers carry .40-caliber pistols.

Hospital supervisor Rohn Larsen said Hansen was in stable condition Sunday. Larsen said he couldn’t reveal which ankle — left or right — the chief shot.

A Weber County dispatcher said nobody from the Riverdale police department was available Sunday to release any information on the accident. A patrol officer on duty Sunday said he didn’t know anything about it.

The chief’s brother, a state lawmaker, said Hansen is a 23-year veteran and chief of the Riverdale police force since 2006.

Rep. Neil Hansen, D-Ogden, said he regularly goes target practicing with his brother and described him as safety-conscious.

“I’ve never seen him do anything reckless,” Neil Hansen told the Standard-Examiner of Ogden.

source

Police Chief Shoots Self at Gun Training Session

Posted in Police Stupidity, Utah Police on May 5th, 2008

RIVERDALE, Utah
The police chief in Riverdale accidentally shot himself in an ankle while demonstrating how to dislodge a jammed handgun.

Chief Dave Hansen was taken to McKay-Dee Hospital in Ogden for surgery.

The 54-year-old chief accidentally fired a gun during a training exercise inside a conference room at Riverdale police headquarters.

A fire captain and Riverdale Mayor Bruce Burrows confirmed the chief shot himself Saturday in an ankle bone. They said he was trying to fix a gun with a jammed round when the bullet fired.

Riverdale police officers carry .40-caliber pistols.

Hospital supervisor Rohn Larsen said Hansen was in stable condition Sunday. Larsen said he couldn’t reveal which ankle — left or right — the chief shot.

A Weber County dispatcher said nobody from the Riverdale police department was available Sunday to release any information on the accident. A patrol officer on duty Sunday said he didn’t know anything about it.

The chief’s brother, a state lawmaker, said Hansen is a 23-year veteran and chief of the Riverdale police force since 2006.

Rep. Neil Hansen, D-Ogden, said he regularly goes target practicing with his brother and described him as safety-conscious.

“I’ve never seen him do anything reckless,” Neil Hansen told the Standard-Examiner of Ogden.

source

My experiences

Posted in Police Brutality, Utah Police, User Submitted on March 4th, 2008

My close friend’s father, whom I have known for 15 years now, is somewhat of an alcoholic and was on anti-depressants at the time, he had also been suicidal for quite a while at the time. Circumstances at home ended up with his father (whom I will call Tom just for the sake of keeping this as private as possible) enraged and drunk - the alcohol hadn’t mixed well with the medication. Tom fired off two or three rounds from one of his rifles into the front lawn and the police were called. At this point the situation quickly got out of control.

The neighbors were evacuated, as was Tom’s family. Tom’s oldest son stayed in the house with him to talk him down. By this time Tom had obtained a pistol. Tom and his son were out in the garage, he was becoming more calm - until he heard a noise outside the side-door of the garage, he opened it to find a police officer. Tom quickly pulled the gun to his own head and threatened to kill himself if the officer didn’t leave him alone. At this point the son, only a few feet away, noticed that the safety was still on so he dove at his father and was able to wrestle the gun away. The son ran out-front of the house and was forced to the ground by the swat team that had by now responded. Tom on the other hand had another gun near and quickly retrieved it, returning to the house.

At this point there wasn’t anyone around the house for a block and the gas had been shut off to the house. He was no longer a threat to anyone but himself. This was also about the time I arrived, being kept behind the police line at the end of the street.

Tom locked himself up in the house, talking with a negotiator, continually threatening suicide but never once threatening a single other person. At one point Tom hung up and went out to the garage - at some point the main garage door had been opened. A swat team was at the end of the driveway, upon seeing them Tom pulled the gun on himself again. The swat team moved up the driveway towards him, Tom threatened to kill himself if they kept coming. At some point one of the swat officers shot Tom with a taser. This is where things start to get hazy.

After being hit with the taser the police initially claimed that he started to point the gun at them. Tom was shot, twice. Once in the arm, once straight through the center of his chest. I want to return to this situation later, but for now I will continue telling Tom’s story.

Tom was life-flighted to a nearby hospital. During the transportation he died three times and had to be resuscitated, he received enough blood transfusions to fill his entire body seven times over. (the quickest detox in history, my friend later joked) It was reported to the medical staff by the police force that the officer had “shot to kill” and had nearly done so, missing Tom’s heart by only a fraction of an inch. I am happy to say that Tom recovered, losing half of his right lung and a significant portion of his rib-cage on that side. He hasn’t drank now for almost seven months.

Now to return to a previous point. As I said, initially the officers claimed to shoot only because Tom started to pull the gun on them. A later report would say that he never pulled the gun on them, but had instead been waving it wildly to the current running through his body after being tasered. And one officer was overheard saying in private that Tom had actually been on the ground at the time, the gun not even in is hand. Noone but the police that had shot him know the truth, all we heard was the police screaming at him and the shots. Tom doesn’t remember anything.

This isn’t my main problem with the situation. What I want to know was why the police were on the offensive? They knew he was drunk, they had been told that there was no more alcohol in the house. He hadn’t threatened anyone but himself, and even if he had he no longer had any way to harm them. All they needed to do was surround the house, stay back, and wait for him to calm down. Instead they had officers all around in inside the house. The situation could have ended much sooner had it not been for the cop near the garage, Tom’s son could have talked him out of the situation. But due to the police that was no longer an option. Later, they could have simply stayed back instead of charging up the driveway and into the garage. Instead they chose start down the path that nearly ended up causing Tom his life.

I realize that Tom was in the wrong with respect to many of his actions, but did he really deserve a bullet through the chest? The police clearly overreacted in my opinion. Some of the precise details may be incorrect, not all the information was disclosed and it’s not the type of thing I like to bring up with my friend to ask him more about the details.
Another, unrelated incident happened a few years back while I was in High School. A student (whom I didn’t know - he was in the year behind me) was skipping class, he had missed many classes and was in trouble due to his attendance record. The police officer posted at our school tracked him down and brought him back to his office. They talked for a minute, then the officer left for some reason that I am not clear on. The student waited for a bit then left, running across the officer near the library. The officer grabbed him by the arm to drag him back to the office, the student pulled his arm away and told the officer not to touch him. At this point the officer put him in a headlock and tackled him, the student’s head was knocked against the ground and he was put in a coma for a little over two weeks.

Although I haven’t dealt with anything of these types of magnitude personally, I have been threatened with arrest and a night in jail twice - once because I fit the description of a person throwing rocks at cars, and once because me and two friends were at a city park at 11 PM, after it was closed. I have had three officers pull their guns on me when I was sixteen due to a dmv mixup where my license plates didn’t make it into the system. I have been accused of either drug or alcohol possession or shoplifting, and forcefully searched almost every time, around seven times now. Been pulled over multiple times, once for speeding and the other times for no apparent reason.

You may think that all of these things happen in the City, but surely not where you live, right? Actually all of this happened in a small suburb in northern Utah.

Posted By: dman88

Police disciplinary files might be sealed!! WE MUST NOT ALLOW THIS

Posted in Utah Police on February 15th, 2008

A police officer could break a lot of rules, and nobody would know about it if a new law passes legislative muster.SB260 would make private all formal charges and disciplinary actions against a peace officer. The only way the public could see them is if the officer agrees.

Sen. Chris Buttars, R-West Jordan, crafted the bill after a man sent public records requests to multiple police departments across the valley asking for disciplinary records for every police officer.

The chiefs believe the man is trying to set up a Web site and charge defense attorneys to set up a database of disciplinary actions. The Deseret Morning News was unable to track down the man.

“We do not want the disciplinary actions by our police departments to be used against them by an enterprising young attorney,” said Dave Spatafore, a lobbyist representing the Utah Chiefs of Police Association.

Public watchdogs worry the bill will allow police officers to get away with bad behavior.

“If a police officer does something wrong, the public has a right to know,” said Joel Campbell of the Utah Press Association. Campbell also pens a column for the Deseret Morning News.

Spatafore said he heard the chiefs are willing to work with public watchdog groups to broaden the proposed law.

Legislators are considering a few other bills that would restrict the public’s access to public information.HB321 would classify certain records of the Utah Educational Savings Plan Trust.

Another bill, HB166, would keep the minutes of public meetings private for 14 days after the meeting, or until the next scheduled meeting, whichever is later.

Minutes of public meetings are often available to the public shortly after the meeting is over, even if the clerk hasn’t finished the final draft. Campbell said the bill, sponsored by Rep. Mel Brown, R-Coalville, would give public officials “an excuse to withhold minutes.” And, in the worst of cases, public officials could use that time to change the minutes to reflect what they want

Police Raid Utah’s Happy Valley Tattoo and Steal Artist’s Art Off the Walls

Posted in Uncategorized, Police Stupidity, Police Corruption, Questionable Actions, Utah Police, User Submitted on February 4th, 2008

p1030685-copy.jpg

This painting along with my art & tattoo portfolio spent four days locked up in the evidence room at the American Fork Police Station. The search warrant gave them permission to only take photographs of pierced or tattoo genitals. As this painting is neither of these items of interest, they have illegally seized my personal property.

Upon the return of this painting my husband was warned that he should not let me display this art publicly again in Utah.

I am not one to comply with an unfair and illegal mandate by anyone - So it went back up into public view - As seen here, two days later. However, some pieces of my portfolio are still locked up in the evidence room after 15 days. I am not being investigated for or being charged with any crime. I just happened to have had my art in the studio the day they raided us.

Why did they raid us?

To make a long story short, a vindictive teenager lied about us.

We do not know all of the details but we suspect it was to get her out of some fix she had gotten into around Christmas time and to get revenge on our piercer who refused her service. All we know for sure, is that her father made a complaint that she had been allowed access to clinical photographs of genital piercings in our studio. Which could only have happened when his estranged wife brought her here to get her lip pierced in April of 2007. (Even if their allegations were true, this is still not and illegal act based on the descriptions of what are obscene materials set by the Utah State Attorney Generals Office.)

To read the full story of The Happy Vally Tattoo Massacre’ go here - http://docloco.com/2008/01/11/the-happy-valley-tattoo-massacre/

The complaint was really only an excuse, as they took everything before they had even opened an investigation. In essence, my art has been taken because the local police believe that they have the right to do anything they want to, anyone they want… They are the judge, jury and executioner. There is no innocent until proven guilty - There’s just guilty and more guilty… And my husband, Doc has a tape of them telling him so.

This is not the first unfair dealings we have had with the American Fork Police Department. A detailed summary of these situations is posted here - http://docloco.com/2008/01/14/happy-valley-tattoo-massacre-part-3/

Mean while in a Salt Lake City Weekly article I read that Utah has the highest rate of online porn use in the United States. Which only confirms my suspicions, that I am a victim of American Fork’s Police Departments idea of what Utah’s “community standards” are; which is literally HYPOCRICY!

I know that there are plenty of members of the community who would disagree with their actions. Some have stopped by the shop to tell us so and some have called the police and voiced their objections.

  • City of American Fork 1-801–763-3000
  • Police Chief – Lance Call 1-801–763-3020
  • City Attorneys - Kasey Wright (Civil) 1-801-763-3031
  • Tucker Hansen (Criminal) 1-801-224-2273

Here are thumbnails of the two pieces being held captive.

You be the judge… Take a look and tell me…

Should prospective tattoo clients be subjected to such “inappropriate” pieces of art as these? Would seeing these pieces “damage” a minor?

00006-copy.jpg kitayourname6-02.jpg

posted by : KitaKaZoo

Former Highway Patrol Officer Caught Robbing Motorists

Posted in Police Corruption, Utah Police on September 27th, 2007

Christopher Mark Topham, wearing his Utah Highway Patrol jacket, badge and gun, pulled over speeding motorists on Interstate 70 in Sevier County. He reportedly asked each motorist to hand over wallet and registration so that he could collect the “fine” on the spot. There was only one problem — Topham retired from the highway patrol in 2003.

On Monday, the respected twelve-year veteran of the force faced felony robbery charges for allegedly robbing motorists between May 23 and June 30 and stealing as much as $9000 from a single traffic stop. Bail was set at $304,070.

Because Utah uses unmarked cars to trap motorists, drivers have no means of protecting themselves from impersonators.

“Do I have to stop for an unmarked car displaying red or red and blue lights?” the Utah Highway Patrol website asks. “Yes. Utah law (Title 41-6a-210 UCA) requires that you stop for a vehicle displaying emergency lights or sounding a siren. If you think the vehicle might be someone impersonating a police officer, you should lock your doors, roll up your windows, and drive to a well-lighted area where other people are present before stopping. If the person is out of uniform insist on seeing his badge and identification card. If, after seeing these credentials, you still feel something isn’t right, insist that a marked patrol car come to the scene. Remain in your locked vehicle until a uniformed officer arrives.”

The alleged robber in this case had both a uniform and a badge. Around the country, the proliferation of unmarked cars has sparked numerous robberies and assaults, many of which remain unsolved.

Article Excerpt:

Utah Code 41-6a-210. Failure to respond to officer’s signal to stop
(1) (a) An operator who receives a visual or audible signal from a peace officer to bring the vehicle to a stop may not:
(i) operate the vehicle in willful or wanton disregard of the signal so as to interfere with or endanger the operation of any vehicle or person; or
(ii) attempt to flee or elude a peace officer by vehicle or other means.
(b) (i) A person who violates Subsection (1)(a) is guilty of a felony of the third degree.
(ii) The court shall, as part of any sentence under this Subsection (1), impose a fine of not less than $1,000.

source